Title: Vertical Shear and Turbulent Mixing in Partially Mixed
Estuaries
Working title: effects
of wind and tidal mixing and straining on near bottom and water column stresses
in partially mixed estuaries
I.
Introduction - York River
Synthesis
a. Physical
setting and properties of the York River
b. Insights
from past experiments – published
i. Early
work
1.
Kiley (1973) (wind and current in the York
River)
2.
Haas (1977) (spring-neap cycle and stratification)
3.
Hayward
(1982) (horizontal salinity reversals and destratification)
ii. Later
studies
1.
Huzzey and Brubaker (1988)
(lateral differences)
2.
Sharples, Simpson and
Brubaker (1994) (periodic stratification)
iii. Recent
work
1.
Simpson et. al. (2005)
2.
Brasseur et. al. (2005) (Isabel)
3.
Scully and Friedrichs (2005)
c. Additional
information from past continuing and unpublished data sets
i. Acrobat
surveys (2003-2004)
ii. CBNERR
data (since 1990's)
iii. MS
502 data (since 2001)
iv. Gloucester
Point surveys (March 2005)
II.
A method for estimating eddy viscosity/diffusivity
using ADCP backscatter
a. Calculating
and calibrating ADCP backscatter to suspended sediment
i. Using
only the absorption/scattering properties of water
ii. Using
an iterative method to include the absorption due to sediment as well.
iii. At
what sediment levels does the second method return appreciably better
calibrations?
b. Method
for determining eddy diffusivity from backscatter using a first order
approximation of the conservation of mass equation.
c. Results
from Chesapeake Bay ETM experiment (BITMAX) 2001-2002
d. Problems
with method and a discussion of settling velocities (Sanford et al., 2005)
III.
A comparison of turbulent parameters with an emphasis
on different techniques using the ADCP
a. The
variance method used to determine eddy viscosity from a moored ADCP (Monismith and Stacey (1999) Simpson et. al.(2005), Williams
and Simpson (2003)
i. Validation
of the method against a bottom mounted ADV (Simpson et. al. (2005) York River 2002)
ii. Comparisons
of 600kHz and 1200 kHz ADCP data from March 2002 York River considering the tradeoff between bin size and
noise. At what vertical bin size are the
bins larger than the measurable eddies and the method becomes invalid?
iii. Use
of the variance method on longer term data sets from Gloucester Point, 2006 and
additional validation using a bottom mounted Nortek Vector ADV.
b. Estimating
eddy diffusivity from ADCP's
i. Using
the backscatter method on data from both shipboard and fixed ADCP's from the
March 2002 York River experiment.
ii. Using
the backscatter method to find spring-neap differences in eddy diffusivity at
Gloucester Point, spring and summer 2006
c. Combining
the eddy viscosity and eddy diffusivity measurements to determine settling
velocity
i. Validate
settling velocities using information from the Owen tube and LISST data
ii. Using
calculated settling velocities, find a linear relationship between eddy
viscosity and eddy diffusivity.
iii. Assuming
a 1:1 relationship between the two, calculate settling velocities in the bottom
boundary layer.
IV.
The effect of wind on vertical turbulence and
horizontal currents in a partially mixed estuary
a. Intensive
study days from the March 2002 VIMS/Wales experiment.
i. Examining
short term wind effects using data from SCAMP, shipboard ADCP, and moored
ADCP's during the 2002 York River Clay Bank experiment.
b. Overall
wind effects from time series data at fixed ADCPs
i. During
the 2002 York River Clay Bank experiment, combining ADCP based measurements
with additional stratification and vertical and horizontal density gradient
information
ii. Use
of wind, wave and current data from Clay Bank and Gloucester Point to determine
the fetch and speed necessary for wind mixing through waves to overcome any
straining effect the wind might have.
iii. The
feasibility of measuring waves and turbulence concurrently using a single RDI
ADCP.
iv. Considerations
of short time scale wind effects and steady state vs. non steady state
conditions.
V.
Modeling tidally varying vertical structure of velocities
and stresses in the water column using GOTM
a. Using
the variance method measured TKE from the Gloucester Point 2006 study, examine
the turbulence stability functions and closure schemes for the 1-D GOTM model.
b. Using
only low or no wind time periods, the measured TKE will be simulated using GOTM. The model can then used to investigate
different conditions of wind and current flow regimes and compare these with
observations under varying conditions of wind, current, riverflow
and waves.
Chapter 1 - research and notes
Chapter 2 - Analysis finished, notes finished, writing paper for publication now. Methods section (7 pages so far, not counting figures), Results section (26 pages including figures), Intro and discussion on the way (finish this in the next 10 days.)
Chapter 3 - Notes and some figures, analysis is about 1/3 complete
Chapter 4 - Notes and about half the figures and research, a lot still needs to be done here in the next month or so, including a lot of thinking and analysis
Chapter 5 - Model is running, 2 or 3 test cases run, need to set model up more specifically for my regions and run different turbulence closure schemes for times when I do have data in order to find which best approximates the reality of these estuaries so that i can apply it to times when i don't have bottom or water column stress data. I may also be adding to this chapter some 3 d modeling with one of my committee members who has a 3-D model of the upper Ches. Bay running and is interested in calibrating it against my data.